Etiopathogenesis, management and outcome of Lid Trauma at Sarojini Devi Eye Hospital

  • Dr. Modini Pandharpurkar Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Dr. M. Santha Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Keywords: Eye lids, Injuries, Etiopathogenesis, Lid Trauma

Abstract

Objective: The main objective is to study the causes of eye lid injuries of patients, management of injury and final outcome in terms of functional and cosmetic aspects among the patients attending the occuloplasty department, in Sarojini Devi Eye hospital Hyderabad.

Methods: This prospective interventional study was undertaken in patients who attended in occuloplasty department, in Sarojini Devi Eye hospital Hyderabad, and diagnoised on the basis of history, clinical symptoms and signs, and try by radiological study. A total of 60 cases of eyelid injuries were studied.

Results: Eye lid injuries were common in males (57%) and in females (22%), among children male (18%) 1 case were common in case of female children 2 (4%). Most of the eye lid injuries were present in the age group between 20-39 years i.e 25 cases (41%). Among the 60 patients RE 36 (60%) is more common than LE 24 cases (40%), in half of the patients 30 cases (50%) were injured, followed by upper lid 19 (30%), both eye lids were injured in 11 (18%) cases.

Conclusions: Eye lid trauma was 3 times more common in males than females, in the present study road traffic accidents (48%) were most common cause for eye lid injuries, 48% of eye lid injuries are full thickness without canalicular involvement, most of these injuries are usually associated with other globe injuries,66.33% of cases were managed with direct closure. Significant injuries with dog bite and with blouse hook while feeding were seen in children these were usually associated with medical canthal and lateral canthal injuries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Iols to, aliojl. symposium on the treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy resolved: corticosteroids should not be used. Ophthalmol. 1999;106:1268-77.

2. Nelson CC. Management of eyelid trauma. Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology. 1991; 19 (4): 357-63.doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071. 1991. tb00686.x

3. Waller RR. Treatment of acute eyelid trauma to prevent late complications. Transactions. Section on Ophthalmology. Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1976; 81(4 Pt 1):OP556-9.

4. AlMahmoud T, Al Hadhrami SM, Elhanan M, Alshamsi HN, Abu-Zidan FM. Epidemiology of eye injuries in a high-income developing country: An observational study. Medicine. 2019;98(26).e16083. doi: 10.1097/MD. 0000000000016083.

5. Choovuthayakorn J, Chavengsaksongkram P, Watanachai N, Chaidaroon W. Penetrating Eyelid and Ocular Fishhook-Related Injury. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2019; 10(1):41-6.doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000496382

6. Yiltok SJ, Wade PD, Mpyet CD, Alli SK, Orkar KS. Eyelid injuries: a nine year review of management. Nig J OrthopaedTraum. 2004;3(2):118-28.

7. Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monokamono-canalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145(2): 375-80.

8. Kennedy RH, May J, Dailey J, Flanagan JC. Canalicular laceration. An 11-year epidemiologic and clinical study. Ophthal Plast Reconstruct Surg. 1990; 6(1): 46-53.

9. Herzum H, Holle P, Hintschich C. Eyelid injuries: epidemiological aspects. Der Ophthalmologe: Zeits-chrift der DeutschenOphthalmologischen Gesellschaft. 2001; 98(11):1079-82.

10. Bai F, Tao H, Zhang Y, Wang P, Han C, Huang YF, Tao Y. Old canalicular laceration repair: a retrospective study of the curative effects and prognostic factors. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(6):902.doi: 10.18240/ijo. 2017. 06.11

11. Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monokamono-canalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):375-80.DOI: https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.018

12. Jordan DR, Ziai S, Gilberg SM, Mawn LA. Pathogenesis of canalicular lacerations. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2008;24(5):394-8.doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e318183267a.

13. Rosser PM, Burt B, Osborne SF. Determination of the function of a repaired canaliculus after monocana-licular injury by placing a punctal plug in the non‐involved punctum on the affected side. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2010;38(8):786-9.doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02330.x.

14. Murchison AP, Bilyk JR. Pediatric canalicular lacerations: epidemiology and variables affecting repair success. J PediatOphthalmolStrab. 2014;51(4):242-8. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20140604-05.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/jooo.2019.i03.12
Published: 2019-07-31
How to Cite
Pandharpurkar, M., & Santha, M. (2019). Etiopathogenesis, management and outcome of Lid Trauma at Sarojini Devi Eye Hospital. Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, 4(3), 250-257. https://doi.org/10.17511/jooo.2019.i03.12
Section
Original Article