Conjunctival autografting with sutures versus without sutures in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study

  • Dr. Happy Kaur Lecturer, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College Jammu, India
  • Dr. Manpreet Kaur Junior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
  • Dr. Babbar Maqbool Assistant Surgeon, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Keywords: Pterygium, Conjuctival autograft, Sutures

Abstract

Introduction: Pterygium is a degenerative condition of subconjunctival tissues that proliferates as vascularized granulation tissue to invade the cornea. Treatment modalities may be medical or surgical.

Objectives: The outcome studied in both groups in terms of operative time, postoperative symptoms, overall graft success.

Material and Method: Prospective, randomized, comparative study conducted on 50 patients over a period of one year in the upgraded Department of Ophthalmology at GMC Jammu. Group, I (25 eyes) underwent attachment of conjunctival autograft by 10-0 silk suture and group II (25 eyes) attachment done without sutures.

Results: Mean operating time was less without sutures (p-value = 0.0001, highly significant), the severity of Post-operative symptoms was more with suture. Graft successfully attached in both groups.

Conclusion: Present study concluded that both are effective methods but autograft without sutures associated with less operating time and less post-operative discomfort in terms of severity and duration

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hill JC, Maske R. Pathogenesis of pterygium. Eye 1989;3(Pt 2):218-226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1989.31.

Cameron ME: History of pterygium: an electron microscopic study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67(9):604-608. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbjo.67.9.604.

Austin P, Jakobire FA, Iwamoto T. Elastodysplasia and elastodystrophy as the pathologic basis of pterygia and pingecula. Ophthalmol. 1998:90(1):96-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34594-2.

Tseng SCG. Concept and application of limbal stem cells. Eye. 1989;3(Pt 2):141-157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1989.22.

Fuchs' E : Ueber das Pterygium. Graefes Arch. Ophthalmol 1892 38:1.

Kamel S. Pterygium; Its nature and a new line of treatment Br J Opthalmol. 1946;30:549-563.

Campodonico E: A new procedure in the excision method of pterygium operations. Tr. Internat. Cong. Ophth Washington. 1922;12:201-204.

Bangerter A. Pterygium operation and covering of conjunctival defects. Ophthalmologica. 1943;106:316.

Aratoon V. Surgery of the pterygium by conjunctival pedicle flap. Am J Opthalmol.1697:63(6):1778-1779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(67)93665-3.

Elsching H, H: Operation for relapsing pterygium.Klin Monatsbl. F. Augenh. 1926 76 :714.

Gomez-Maruez.J:New Operative Procedure for Pterygium.Arch. De oftal hispano-am 1931;32-87.

Kenyon KR, Wagoner MD, Hettinger ME: Conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmol. 1985;92(11):1461-1470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(85)33831-9.

D' Ombrain A: The surgical treatment of pterygium. Br J Opthalmol 1948;32(2):65-71. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbjo.32.2.65.

Bernstein M, Unger SM: Experience with surgery and Strontium 90 in the treatment of pterygium. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960;49(5):1024-1029. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(60)91828-6.

Liddy B St. L, Morgan JF: Triethylene thiophosphoramide (thiotepa) and pterygium. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;61(5 Pt 1):888-890. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(66)90931-7.

Zauberman H Pterygium and its recurence Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;63(6):1780-1786. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(67)93666-5.

Youngson RM. Recurrence of pterygium after excision. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56(2):120-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.56.2.120.

Singh G and Rana RK: Evaluation of new polishing technique in surgery of primary pterygium. Ind J Ophthalmol. 1982;30(4):281-284. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1982/30/4/281/29450.

Anthrayose CV, Meinz N, Mani EJ: Selection of surgical technique and supportive treatment for the management of primary pterygium. Proc 54th Annual Conference, AIOS in Pasricha JK ed: Indian J Ophthalmology 1996 (Yearbook), pp 272-273.

Kunitomo N. Studies on the pterygium. Part 4. A treatment of the pterygium by mitomycin-C instillation. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn. 1963;67:601-607.

Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Gallenga PE. Long term results of intraoperative mitomycin C in the treatment of recurrent pterygium. Brit J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(4):288-291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.80.4.288.

Cardillo JA, Alves MR, Ambrosio LE, Poterio MB, Jose NK. Single intraoperative application versus postoperative mitomycin C eye drops in pterygium surgery. Ophthalmol. 1995;102(12):1949-1952. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30770-1.

Malik KP, Goel R, Gupta A, Gupta SK, Kamal S, Malik VK, Singh S. Efficacy of sutureless and glue free limbal conjunctival autograft for primary pterygium surgery. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2012;4(2):230-235. doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v4i2.6537.

Wit D, Athanasiadis I, Sharma A, Moore J Sutureless and glueless free conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: A case series. Eye.2010:24(9):1474-1477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.75.

Suzuki T, Sano Y, Kinoshita S. Conjunctival inflammation induces Langerhans cell migration into the cornea. Curr Eye Res. 2000;21(1):550-553.

Mitra S. Autoblood as tissue adhesive for conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery. External Diseases Free Papers. 2011:562.

Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Borazan M. Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(9):1206-1210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.139600.

Yüksel B, Ūnsal SK, Onat S. Comparison of fibrin glue and suture technique in pterygium surgery performed with limbal autograft. Int J Ophthalmol. 2010;3(4):316.

Elwan S, Comparison between suture less and glue free versus sutured limbal conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium surgery. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2014;28(4):292-298. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.sjopt.2014.03.012.

Hall RC, Logan A J, Wells A P. Comparison of fibrin glue with sutures for pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografts. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009:37(6):584-589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02105.x.

Sharma A, Moore J. Autologous fibrin glue for pterygium surgery with conjunctival autograft. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32(5):209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2009.05.005.

Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD, Lim-Bon-Siong R. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmol. 2005;112(4):667-671. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.08.028.

Bahar I, Weinberger D, Gaton DD, Avisar R. Fibrin glue versus vicryl sutures for primary conjunctival closure in pterygium surgery: long-term results. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32(5):399-405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680701294723.

CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/jooo.2020.i02.02
Published: 2020-02-29
How to Cite
Kaur, H., Kaur, M., & Maqbool, B. (2020). Conjunctival autografting with sutures versus without sutures in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, 5(2), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.17511/jooo.2020.i02.02
Section
Original Article