Effect of pterygiumseverity on visual
acuity and contrast sensitivity
Vohra M.1, Agarwal R.2, Vohra
J.3, Maggoo A.4, Rohatgi S.5
1Dr.
Malini Vohra, Assistant Professor, 2Dr. Ruchika Agarwal, Associate Professor;
3Dr. Jaya Vohra, Senior Resident, Government Medical College Ratlam,
M P. 4Dr. Ashish Maggoo, Kanpur, U P, 5Dr. Sanjeev
Rohatgi, Professor, 1,2,5authors are affiliated with Rama Medical
College and Research Centre, Mandhna, Kanpur, U.P. India.
Corresponding Author: Dr.
Ruchika Agarwal, 7/57, Ratan Enclave, Tilak Nagar, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: ruchidrjain@yahoo.co.in
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate prospectively the effect
of pterygium excision on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity before and
after surgery. Material & method: A
prospective observational study where in 63 eyes of 63 patients with primary pterygia
were studied before and after surgery. Examination was done in which
contrast sensitivity was measured with pellirobson chart pre-operatively and
one month postoperatively following pterygium excision with Conjunctival Limbal
Auto Graft. Result: As the grade of
pterygium increases, decrement in contrast sensitivity occurs. The visual
acuity significantly increased after the surgery. Mean contrast sensitivity
following pterygium surgery improved from 1.49±0.21 to 1.70±0.20 (p value <0.001).
Conclusion: Visual acuity and
contrast sensitivity improved significantly following pterygium excision surgery.
Key words: pterygium, conjunctiva, fibrous connective
Author Corrected: 4th March 2019 Accepted for Publication: 7 th March 2019
Introduction
The pterygium is
classically defined as a degenerative disease of the ocular surface with
triangular fibrovascular tissue formation, which grows from the
conjunctivatowards the surface of the cornea [1]. Although histopathogenesis has not been fully elucidated; it is
verylikely that the pterygium represents a degenerativeresponse of the fibrous
connective tissue to different stimuli. Among the risk factors, exposure to ultravioletradiation
appears to play an important role in inducing damage to the limbal stem cells.
As a result, there is a migration of the conjunctiva towards the cornea,
chronic inflammation and fibrovascular tissue formation [2]. Other risk factors
described related to the development of pterygium are the micro-traumas in the
corneal limbus region and hereditary factors. The main risk factor is exposure
to ultraviolet rays, and a possible explanation of this fact would be the
location of pterygium, mainly in theinterpalpebral fissure, which is more
exposed to sun raysand dust, leading to inflammation of the ocular
surface.Recently, it was suggested that there is a mutation in thep53 gene on
chromosome 17 as the cause of this disease,and changes in the expression of
various growth factors,such as vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA). Histologically,
the pterygium is characterized by elastoticdegeneration of the conjunctival
substantia propria, with eosinophilic and basophilic deposits and fibroblast proliferation
[1]. Large pterygia occluding the visual axisdecrease visual acuity. However, even
before entering theoptical zone, an advancing pterygium can cause
visualimpairment by locally flattening the cornea and inducingwith-the-rule
astigmatism and decreasing contrast sensitivity. Previous reports have
demonstrated that the topographic changes in the cornea and visual impairment
induced by pterygia can be reversed following removal [3]. Contrast sensitivity
is reported to be involved in visual performance in daily life and in indoor
activities such as face recognition[4,5].
The contrast sensitivity
function has proved auseful tool for detecting visual
disturbances when Snellen acuity failstoshow comparabledys function for in
pterygia. Pterygium causes reduction in contrast sensitivity. Both spatial contrast sensitivity and
glare disability are worsened in patients with pterygia even when the Snellen
visual acuity is minimally affected. The decline of
contrastsensitivity in eyes with pterygium and relatively goodvision on
Snellen's optotypes is the cause of somesubjective complaints of the patients
and may be animportant factor in indication of pterygium surgery ofeyes with a
relatively good visual acuity. We performedthis study in order to investigate
the effect of pterygium surgery contrast sensitivity and visual acuity.
Materials and Methods
Type of study:
Prospective interventional case study wasconducted.
Place of study:
Cornea Clinic of Department of Ophthalmology, Rama Medical College and Research
Centre Mandhna, Kanpur. The study included 63
patientsattending the OPD and Cornea Clinic of the Departmentof Ophthalmology,
Rama Medical College and Research Centre Mandhna, Kanpur.
Inclusion criteria:
Patients with primary pterygium with ≥2D astigmatism were included in study.
Exclusion criteria: Pterygium
with any anterior orposterior segment pathology was excluded from study.
Statistical method:
re-operative and postoperative valueswere compared using paired t–test.
Contrast sensitivity was compared against the grade of pterygium usingANOVA
test.
Surgical Procedure:
All surgeries were performed underperibulbaranesthesia.A small conjunctival incision was made medial to head of
pterygium and sub conjunctival dissection
carried out up to caruncle, superior and inferior fornix. The corneal
epithelium 2 mm anterior of head was scrapped off with blade no. 11 Bard Parker
blade and the pterygium head avulsed using a combination of blunt dissection
and traction. The body of pterygium was then excised. Hemostasis was achieved
by applying lightcautery to bleeders. After the pterygium mass was removed, a
limbal-conjunctival auto graft was procured from the superior conjunctiva; the
graft dissection was extended approximately 0.5mm into clear cornea to include
the Vogt palisades and limbal stem cells. This graft was moved to cover the defective
area and wassecured with 10-0 nylon sutures.The limbal end of the autograft was
placed directly over the limbal area of thesurgical bed. The sutures were
removed under the operating microscope after conjunctival epithelialization
occurred.
Examination included:
Snellen visual acuity, slit lamp examination, manual keratometry, contrast
sensitivity
with pellirobson chart was done pre-operatively and
one month post operatively. Nasal pterygium was graded
depending on the extent of corneal involvement.
Grade I –
Pterygium crossing limbus < 2mm ontocornea.
Grade II –
Pterygium crossing limbus onto ≥2 -4 mm ofcornea
Grade III –
Pterygium crossing limbus onto > 4mm ofcornea and reaching up to pupillary
margin
Grade IV-
Pterygium crossing pupillary margin.
Contrast
Sensitivity Examination: Contrast sensitivity
was recorded using Pelli- Robson chart. Method of recording contrast sensitivity with
Pelli- Robson chart: Subject was seated directly in front of Pelli-Robson chart
at a distance of 1 meter with the best distance correction. Subject is asked to
outline each letter on the chart. Test is concluded when the subject guesses
two of the three letters of the triplet incorrectly. Subject’s sensitivity is
indicated by the finest triplet for which two of the three letters are named
correctly.
Table
No.-1: Grade wise distribution of cases/eyes
Grade
of pterygium |
Number
of patient |
Grade I |
8 |
Grade II |
27 |
Grade III |
25 |
Grade IV |
30 |
Total |
63 |
Table
1 shows grade wise distribution of cases. In present study, 8 eyes had grade I
pterygium, 27 eyes had grade II pterygium, 25 eyes had grade III pterygium and
3 eyes had grade IV.
Table
No.-2: Comparison of grade wise pre-op and post op contrast sensitivity (CS)
Grade
of pterygium |
Pre-Op
Mean C S |
Post-Op
Mean CS |
P
value |
Grade I |
1.69 ±0.20 |
1.89±0.20 |
0.22 |
Grade II |
1.51±0.13 t |
1.74±0.14 |
<0.001 |
Grade III |
1.45D±0.19 |
1.64±0.16 |
<0.001 |
Grade IV |
1.25±0.10 |
1.45±0.10 |
<0.001 |
Mean |
1.49±0.21 to |
1.70±0.20 |
<0.001 |
The above table shows that pterygium excision
surgery cause improvement in contrast sensitivity in all grades of pterygium.
The improvement was significant in grade II,III,IV having p value (<0.001)
and not significant in grade I p value (0.225).
Table
No.-3: Comparison of pre-op and post op BCVA
Grade
of pterygium |
Pre-Op
Mean BCVA |
Post-Op
Mean BCVA |
P
value |
Grade I |
0.85 +/_0.17 |
0.95+/_0.10 |
0.184 |
Grade II |
0.58 +/_0.22 |
0.79+/_0.21 |
<0.001 |
Grade III |
0.41+/_0.14 |
0.56+/_0.14 |
<0.001 |
Grade IV |
0.08 +/_0.02 |
0.18+/_0.07 |
<0.001 |
The above table shows improvement of Bcva in all grades of pterygium
following pterygium excision surgery. The improvement was significant in grade
II,III,IV p value (<0.001) and not significant in grade I p value (0.184).
Discussion
A pterygium-induced refractive change often leads
tovisual impairment. Pterygium leads to inflammation, foreign body sensation,
tearing, dry and itchy eye. The indications for pterygium surgery are cosmetic disfigurement,
visual impairment, recurrent inflammationand motility restriction. Surgical
intervention resulted inan increase in the mean refractive power at one
monthafter surgery, which indicates a steepening of flattened cornea. Pterygium
induced astigmatism appears to be dueto alteration in tear film caused by
lesion. As the head of pterygium approaches the apex of cornea, a tear meniscus
develops between the corneal apex and the elevated pterygium, causing an
apparent flattening of normal corneal curvature [6,7]. Previous studies have
shown thatpterygium cause corneal distortion which induce a significant amount
of astigmatism[8,9,10,11]. The exactmechanism of flattening in horizontal
meridian due topterygium is not clear. It is thought to be caused by
theformation of tear meniscus between the corneal apex [6,12]and the elevated
pterygium, causing an apparentflattening of the normal corneal curvature[13].
As thisflattening is along the horizontal meridian, it usuallycauses
with-the-rule corneal astigmatism. Pterygiumexcision induces a reversal of
pterygium related corneal flattening[6,14]. Comparison of pre and post operative
corneal topography also revealed significant changes in the majority of
topographic parameters. Numerous studies have documented improvement in the
corneal condition and topographic indices after pterygium excision [15,16,17]. Unlike
Yasar et al[12] who considered no role for fibrovascular traction in
pterygium induced corneal changes, Oldenburg et al[6] and Budak et al[18]
hypothesized that flattening of the cornea and changes in the corneal
topography may be produced by a pooling oftears at the apex of the pterygium or
by its mechanical traction. These abnormalities and their effects on thecornea
are mostly reversible by the surgery especially inthe cases of early
intervention [17,15,24,21]. Previous studies have reported the association of
pterygium and contrast sensitivity. Lin et al in 1989 showed that
contrast sensitivity was lower at all spatial frequencies in thepatients with
pterygium. Another study showed that contrast sensitivity at medium to-high
spatial frequenciesof 6, 12, and 18cpd significantly improved after pterygium
excision, while contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequencies of 1.5 and 3cpd
did not change aftersurgery [20].
A Maliket al [21] found a significant
negativecorrelation was seen between contrast sensitivity and thevertical,
horizontal dimensions and the area of thepterygium. Maximum correlation was
seen with thevertical dimension of pterygium, followed by area andthen
horizontal width. In present study it was observedthat contrast sensitivity
decreases with increase in gradeof pterygium. Contrast sensitivity reduced
maximally ingrade IV and minimally in grade I. There was statistically significant
correlation between grade of pterygium and, contrast sensitivity (p
value<0.001). Our findings are inaccordance with the findings of another
workers Lin et al in1989 [22]. Pterygium can cause an asymmetric
distortion ofthe cornea, because the lesion typically extends radiallyfrom the
corneal periphery. The disruption to the cornealsurface topography induces both
coma and trefoil wave front errors (WFEs)[23,24]. There is commonly an increase
incorneal and refractive astigmatism with pterygium as wellas an increase in
Higher-order wave front error (HOWFE), with an effect proportional to the
extent of thelesion [25,26]. Because the condition approaches lateral to
thevisual axis, a change in Surface Asymmetry Index (SAI) is not usually a
feature of the condition. Higher-orderwave front error is associated with
correspondingreduction in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity [27].Studies
indicate that contrast sensitivity testing may provide additional objective
methods for documenting impaired vision in patients with pterygiumwhen Snellen
visual acuity is minimally affected [28].Corneal astigmatism and contrast
sensitivity values inpatients with pterygia are useful indicators for the
needof pterygium surgery or as indicators of surgical success [29]. In the
present study, 8 eyes had grade 1pterygium, 27eyes had grade 2 pterygium, 25
eyes hadgrade 3pterygium and 3 eyes had grade 4 pterygium. Ourfindings are in
accordance with the findings of otherworkers[30].The preoperative mean
astigmatism was3.29D±1.46. The astigmatism decreased significantly following pterygium
excision. The mean preoperativerefractive cylinder decreased from 3.29D±1.46 D
to1.49±0.82 D postoperatively (p<0.001). Pterygiuminduced impaired visual
acuity may be caused by analteration in tear film or by mechanical effects of
the lesion. Therefore, excision of the lesion may lead to reconstruction of the
normal surface, and thus, improvement in the visual acuity [26]. Statistically improvement
in BCVA in grade II, grade III and grade IVpterygium was due to reduction of
astigmatism. Linet.al.in 1989 found that contrast sensitivity was lower atall
spatial frequencies in the patients with pterygium.Another study observed that
contrast sensitivity at mediumto-high spatial frequencies of 6,12, and
18cpdsignificantly improved after pterygium excision, whilecontrast sensitivity
at low spatial frequencies of 1.5 and 3cpd did not change after surgery [30].In
present study it wasobserved that contrast sensitivity decreases with
increasein grade of pterygium. Contrast sensitivity reduced maximally in grade
IV and minimally in grade I. There was statistically significant correlation
between grade ofpterygium and contrast sensitivity. Our findings are in accordance
with the findings of Lin et al in 1989. The contrast sensitivity
improved significantly following pterygium excision. The mean preoperative
contrasts ensitivity increased from 1.49±0.21 to 1.70±0.20 post operatively.
Surgical removal of pterygium caused asignificant improvement in contrast
sensitivity. The mean preoperative contrast sensitivity improved from1.69±0.20
to 1.83±0.20 post operatively (p=0.22) in grade Ipterygium, from1.51±0.13 to
1.74±0.14 was noticed in grade II. In grade III pterygium contrast sensitivityincreased
and in grade IV contrast sensitivity increased from1.25±0.10 to1.45±0.10. The
amount of contrast sensitivity increased significantly following pterygium
excision ingrade II, grade III and grade IV but in grade I, the increase in the
amount of contrast sensitivity after pterygium excision was not statistically
significant (pvalue 0.22).
Conclusions
Surgical excision of pterygium improves contrastsensitivity,
visual acuity and reduce astigmatism.Contrast sensitivity is reported to be
involved in visual performance in daily life and in indoor activities such as
face recognition. The contrast sensitivity function has provedauseful tool for detecting
visual disturbances when Snellenacuity failstoshow comparabledys function for
in pterygia. Contrast sensitivity testing may provide additional objective
methods for documenting impaired vision in patients with pterygium when Snellen
visual acuity is minimally affected. Corneal astigmatism and
contrastsensitivity values in patients with pterygia are useful indicators for
the need of pterygium surgery or as indicators of surgical success. The study demonstrates
usefulness of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity tests and how they can be
incorporated into the decision as to when to do pterygium excision surgery. The
decline of contrast sensitivity in eyes with pterygium and relatively good vision
on Snellen's optotypes is the cause of some subjective complaints of the
patients and may be animportant factor in indication of pterygium surgery ofeyes
with a relatively good visual acuity.
Current
study Added to the existing Knowledge: Contrast
sensitivity testing may provide additional objective methods for documenting
impaired vision inpatients with pterygium when Snellen visual acuity is minimally
affected. The study demonstrates usefulness of visual acuity and contrast
sensitivity tests and how they can be incorporated into the decision as to when
to do pterygium excision surgery.
Contribution
from Various authors
·
Dr. MaliniVohra
-Designing of study and manuscript preparation.
·
Dr. Ruchika Agarwal - Maintenance
of data and follow up of patients
·
Dr. Jaya Vohra
–Statistical analysis and collection of references
·
Dr Ashish Maggoo- Reference
of patients.
·
Dr. Sanjeev Rohatgi- Critical
analysis of the whole study
Conflicts
of Interest: Nil
Funding: Nil
References
How to cite this article?
Vohra M, Agarwal R, Vohra J, Maggoo A, Rohatgi S. Effect of pterygium severity on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Ophthal Rev: Tro J ophtha & Oto. 2019;4(1):42-47.doi:10.17511/jooo.2019.i1.09